$104M
Total capital required (all phases)
$105.8M
Identified funding (gap fully closed)
$7.95M
Year 1 projected revenue
Yr 2–3
Target financial sustainability
180K
Stabilized annual skier visits (Yr 6+)
Section 1

Estimated capital costs

Key cost drivers: access road and power infrastructure ($25M, 3–4 mile Morgan Valley corridor), lifts ($27.5M, ~34% of hard costs), and base lodge ($11.5M). Contingency set at 22% reflecting USFS greenfield complexity. Land acquisition is $0 under an assumed USFS Special Use Permit for the illustrative northern Wasatch site. If a private land site is selected, acquisition costs would be added.
Cost ItemEstimated Cost
Land Acquisition (USFS SUP assumed)$0
Lift Installation (5 fixed-grip quads @ $5.5M)$27,500,000
Magic Carpet / Surface Lift$400,000
Trail Development (650 acres @ $8K)$5,200,000
Snowmaking System$7,500,000
Base Lodge (~30,000 sq ft, no-frills)$11,500,000
Parking$2,500,000
Access Road (3–4 miles, Morgan Valley corridor)$22,000,000
Utilities / Power Infrastructure$3,000,000
Grooming Equipment (2 snowcats)$1,200,000
Rental Fleet (prior-season used)$150,000
Snowmobiles & Off-Road Vehicles$200,000
Permitting & Design$5,000,000
Construction Contingency (22%)$17,853,000
Total Capital Requirement$104,003,000
Phase 1 — Pilot
Opening day
$65–75M

3 lifts + magic carpet, ~500 acres, full base lodge, access road, power infrastructure, snowmaking. Full operational opening.

Target: 2029 opening
Phase 2 — Expansion
Full terrain
$30–35M

2 additional lifts, remaining ~500 acres. Triggered once Phase 1 demonstrates financial sustainability.

Years 4–6
Phase 3+ — Growth
Further expansion
TBD

Additional terrain into adjacent drainages if the site supports it. Managed access if overcrowding occurs.

Years 7+
Section 2

Annual operating costs

Costs are structured into Controllable and Non-Controllable categories per industry best practice. Variable labor scales daily with skier visit counts, protecting margin in slow periods. All costs escalate at 3% annually.
Operating Line ItemYear 1Year 6 (Stabilized)
Controllable — Fixed Labor
Fixed Labor (fully loaded, incl. benefits)$1,006,317$1,400,000
Controllable — Variable Labor
Variable Labor (fully loaded, incl. benefits)$1,480,970$2,852,000
Total Controllable Labor$2,487,287$4,252,000
Non-Controllable Expenses
Lift Operations & Maintenance$800,000$928,000
Snowmaking & Grooming (operating)$350,000$406,000
Utilities (electricity, water)$250,000$290,000
Insurance (GL + Workers Comp)$500,000$580,000
USFS Land Use Fee$150,000$174,000
F&B Cost of Goods (~35% of F&B revenue)$252,000$567,000
Marketing & Outreach$150,000$174,000
Maintenance & Repairs$200,000$232,000
Summer Maintenance Staff$175,000$203,000
Snowmobile & Vehicle Operating Costs$40,000$46,000
Total Annual Operating Costs$5,204,000$7,680,000
Section 3

Revenue projections

Pricing is set to remain meaningfully below the Utah market while reflecting the resort's superior terrain and vertical drop. The $59 resident day ticket is the most affordable for a quality Utah mountain. Revenue grows as word-of-mouth builds and school district partnerships expand.
Year 1 total revenue
$7.95M
80,000 skier visits. Operating surplus of ~$2.74M. A strong opening year driven by season pass pre-sales — well below the resort's 180,000 stabilized capacity ceiling.
Year 5 total revenue
$12.5M
147,000 skier visits. Operating surplus of ~$6.0M. Resort is self-sustaining and generating meaningful surplus to service bond debt.
Year 10 total revenue
$17.9M
Stabilized at 180,000 visits/year. Operating surplus of ~$9.3M annually — fully covering bond service costs with substantial margin remaining.
Revenue StreamYear 1Year 5Year 10
Skier Visits80,000147,000180,000
Lift Ticket Revenue — Resident ($59)$2,478,000$3,900,000$5,576,000
Lift Ticket Revenue — Non-Resident ($119)$1,666,000$2,621,000$3,749,000
Season Pass Revenue ($750 res. / $1,250 non-res.)$1,750,000$2,754,000$3,938,000
Rental Revenue$1,260,000$1,983,000$2,835,000
Food & Beverage Revenue$720,000$1,133,000$1,620,000
School Program Revenue ($15/student)$75,000$110,000$177,000
Total Revenue$7,949,000$12,500,000$17,893,000
Total Operating Costs($5,204,000)($6,505,000)($8,569,000)
Operating Surplus / (Deficit)$2,745,000$5,994,000$9,324,000

Revenue figures are illustrative estimates from the companion Excel model. Financial sustainability target is Year 2–3. The Excel workbook allows full sensitivity testing on all assumptions.

Section 4

Funding sources

Utah has a strong ecosystem of recreation and infrastructure funding tools. The model identifies nine funding sources totaling $105.75M — fully covering the $104M total capital requirement with a $1.75M reserve. A diversified funding stack reduces reliance on any single mechanism and strengthens the legislative case.
Funding SourceAmountNotes
State Legislative Appropriation / Bond$38,000,000Primary mechanism. Mirrors proven NY ORDA public ski area operating model.
State Government Bonds (30-yr, GO)$30,000,000~4% rate; ~$1.7M annual debt service, covered by operating surplus from Year 3+.
2034 Olympic Venue Development Funding$18,000,000Access road serves Olympic-area transportation goals directly — a natural funding bridge for infrastructure of this scale.
Federal Transportation / RAISE Grant$8,000,000Access road qualifies as regional recreation infrastructure. RAISE grants have funded comparable recreation access corridors.
Tourism Revenue Subsidy (Resort Operators)$5,000,000Public access reinvestment from Utah resort tax revenue generated by major multi-resort pass operators.
Land & Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)$5,000,00050% federal match; NPS-administered. Perpetual public recreation use required — aligns perfectly with project mission.
Utah Outdoor Recreation Grant$1,000,000Regional Asset Tier; up to $1M. Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation administers.
Philanthropic / Corporate Sponsorship$500,000Ski industry partners, school districts, local businesses.
Pre-Opening Season Pass Sales (Founding)$250,000Founding member passes at $499; early working capital before opening day.
Total Identified Funding$105,750,000Fully covers $104,003,000 capital requirement — $1.75M reserve retained for development contingency.
Remaining Gap$0Funding stack fully closes the capital requirement.
Section 5

Key risks & mitigations

RiskMitigation
Low snowfall years Base elevation of ~7,200 ft significantly reduces risk vs. existing low-elevation Utah resorts. Snowmaking system in capital plan covers key lower-mountain terrain. High-elevation site selection criterion in formal feasibility study.
Visit volume below projections Year 1 target of 80K is conservative — well below stabilized 180K ceiling. School program provides guaranteed demand floor from Day 1. Non-resident pricing is a direct lever to increase visit volume if needed.
Overcrowding if demand exceeds capacity Overcrowding at a financially solvent resort is proof of concept, not failure. Response options: lottery-style day ticket reservation system or Phase 2 terrain expansion trigger.
Permitting & environmental review delays 22% construction contingency included. NEPA review assumed at 2 years, built into 2029 target opening timeline (1 yr feasibility, 2 yrs permitting/design, 1 yr construction).
Access road cost overrun Road budgeted at $22M for a 3–4 mile Morgan Valley access corridor including power and utility infrastructure. Existing Forest Service roads may reduce new construction required. Final road cost determined in site feasibility study.
Political / market pushback from existing resorts Resident-only pricing and terrain differentiation target a non-overlapping market segment. Overcrowding relief at existing resorts is a shared benefit that can be used to frame the proposal as complementary, not competitive.
Section 6

Operating models worth evaluating

Three governance structures are worth evaluating in a formal feasibility study, each with different implications for state exposure, pricing flexibility, and long-term sustainability.

ModelDescriptionProsCons
State Authority
Recommended
State creates a public ski authority that owns and operates the resort with a professional management board. Mirrors ORDA/Gore Mountain model. Full pricing control; mission-driven; access to state capital; strongest precedent State absorbs operating risk; requires legislative action
Public-Private Partnership State owns land and core infrastructure; private operator manages day-to-day under a resident-pricing mandate. Reduces state operational burden; brings private management expertise Mission drift risk over time; less long-term pricing control
Nonprofit Operator State funds capital; a nonprofit entity manages operations with a public-benefit charter. Mission-aligned by structure; lean operations; community ownership culture Fundraising complexity; harder to scale; less access to state capital
Questions or feedback?

The companion Excel model
is available on request

All figures in this summary come from a fully editable Excel workbook with live formulas for sensitivity testing. Reach out to discuss the assumptions or request the working model.

Request the Excel model Back to the proposal