The numbers
behind the vision
All figures are illustrative estimates for planning and discussion purposes. Site selection has not been finalized — values are based on an example northern Wasatch site. A formal feasibility study would refine all assumptions. The companion Excel workbook contains editable inputs.
Estimated capital costs
| Cost Item | Estimated Cost |
|---|---|
| Land Acquisition (USFS SUP assumed) | $0 |
| Lift Installation (5 fixed-grip quads @ $5.5M) | $27,500,000 |
| Magic Carpet / Surface Lift | $400,000 |
| Trail Development (650 acres @ $8K) | $5,200,000 |
| Snowmaking System | $7,500,000 |
| Base Lodge (~30,000 sq ft, no-frills) | $11,500,000 |
| Parking | $2,500,000 |
| Access Road (3–4 miles, Morgan Valley corridor) | $22,000,000 |
| Utilities / Power Infrastructure | $3,000,000 |
| Grooming Equipment (2 snowcats) | $1,200,000 |
| Rental Fleet (prior-season used) | $150,000 |
| Snowmobiles & Off-Road Vehicles | $200,000 |
| Permitting & Design | $5,000,000 |
| Construction Contingency (22%) | $17,853,000 |
| Total Capital Requirement | $104,003,000 |
3 lifts + magic carpet, ~500 acres, full base lodge, access road, power infrastructure, snowmaking. Full operational opening.
2 additional lifts, remaining ~500 acres. Triggered once Phase 1 demonstrates financial sustainability.
Additional terrain into adjacent drainages if the site supports it. Managed access if overcrowding occurs.
Annual operating costs
| Operating Line Item | Year 1 | Year 6 (Stabilized) |
|---|---|---|
| Controllable — Fixed Labor | ||
| Fixed Labor (fully loaded, incl. benefits) | $1,006,317 | $1,400,000 |
| Controllable — Variable Labor | ||
| Variable Labor (fully loaded, incl. benefits) | $1,480,970 | $2,852,000 |
| Total Controllable Labor | $2,487,287 | $4,252,000 |
| Non-Controllable Expenses | ||
| Lift Operations & Maintenance | $800,000 | $928,000 |
| Snowmaking & Grooming (operating) | $350,000 | $406,000 |
| Utilities (electricity, water) | $250,000 | $290,000 |
| Insurance (GL + Workers Comp) | $500,000 | $580,000 |
| USFS Land Use Fee | $150,000 | $174,000 |
| F&B Cost of Goods (~35% of F&B revenue) | $252,000 | $567,000 |
| Marketing & Outreach | $150,000 | $174,000 |
| Maintenance & Repairs | $200,000 | $232,000 |
| Summer Maintenance Staff | $175,000 | $203,000 |
| Snowmobile & Vehicle Operating Costs | $40,000 | $46,000 |
| Total Annual Operating Costs | $5,204,000 | $7,680,000 |
Revenue projections
| Revenue Stream | Year 1 | Year 5 | Year 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skier Visits | 80,000 | 147,000 | 180,000 |
| Lift Ticket Revenue — Resident ($59) | $2,478,000 | $3,900,000 | $5,576,000 |
| Lift Ticket Revenue — Non-Resident ($119) | $1,666,000 | $2,621,000 | $3,749,000 |
| Season Pass Revenue ($750 res. / $1,250 non-res.) | $1,750,000 | $2,754,000 | $3,938,000 |
| Rental Revenue | $1,260,000 | $1,983,000 | $2,835,000 |
| Food & Beverage Revenue | $720,000 | $1,133,000 | $1,620,000 |
| School Program Revenue ($15/student) | $75,000 | $110,000 | $177,000 |
| Total Revenue | $7,949,000 | $12,500,000 | $17,893,000 |
| Total Operating Costs | ($5,204,000) | ($6,505,000) | ($8,569,000) |
| Operating Surplus / (Deficit) | $2,745,000 | $5,994,000 | $9,324,000 |
Revenue figures are illustrative estimates from the companion Excel model. Financial sustainability target is Year 2–3. The Excel workbook allows full sensitivity testing on all assumptions.
Funding sources
| Funding Source | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| State Legislative Appropriation / Bond | $38,000,000 | Primary mechanism. Mirrors proven NY ORDA public ski area operating model. |
| State Government Bonds (30-yr, GO) | $30,000,000 | ~4% rate; ~$1.7M annual debt service, covered by operating surplus from Year 3+. |
| 2034 Olympic Venue Development Funding | $18,000,000 | Access road serves Olympic-area transportation goals directly — a natural funding bridge for infrastructure of this scale. |
| Federal Transportation / RAISE Grant | $8,000,000 | Access road qualifies as regional recreation infrastructure. RAISE grants have funded comparable recreation access corridors. |
| Tourism Revenue Subsidy (Resort Operators) | $5,000,000 | Public access reinvestment from Utah resort tax revenue generated by major multi-resort pass operators. |
| Land & Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) | $5,000,000 | 50% federal match; NPS-administered. Perpetual public recreation use required — aligns perfectly with project mission. |
| Utah Outdoor Recreation Grant | $1,000,000 | Regional Asset Tier; up to $1M. Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation administers. |
| Philanthropic / Corporate Sponsorship | $500,000 | Ski industry partners, school districts, local businesses. |
| Pre-Opening Season Pass Sales (Founding) | $250,000 | Founding member passes at $499; early working capital before opening day. |
| Total Identified Funding | $105,750,000 | Fully covers $104,003,000 capital requirement — $1.75M reserve retained for development contingency. |
| Remaining Gap | $0 | Funding stack fully closes the capital requirement. |
Key risks & mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Low snowfall years | Base elevation of ~7,200 ft significantly reduces risk vs. existing low-elevation Utah resorts. Snowmaking system in capital plan covers key lower-mountain terrain. High-elevation site selection criterion in formal feasibility study. |
| Visit volume below projections | Year 1 target of 80K is conservative — well below stabilized 180K ceiling. School program provides guaranteed demand floor from Day 1. Non-resident pricing is a direct lever to increase visit volume if needed. |
| Overcrowding if demand exceeds capacity | Overcrowding at a financially solvent resort is proof of concept, not failure. Response options: lottery-style day ticket reservation system or Phase 2 terrain expansion trigger. |
| Permitting & environmental review delays | 22% construction contingency included. NEPA review assumed at 2 years, built into 2029 target opening timeline (1 yr feasibility, 2 yrs permitting/design, 1 yr construction). |
| Access road cost overrun | Road budgeted at $22M for a 3–4 mile Morgan Valley access corridor including power and utility infrastructure. Existing Forest Service roads may reduce new construction required. Final road cost determined in site feasibility study. |
| Political / market pushback from existing resorts | Resident-only pricing and terrain differentiation target a non-overlapping market segment. Overcrowding relief at existing resorts is a shared benefit that can be used to frame the proposal as complementary, not competitive. |
Operating models worth evaluating
Three governance structures are worth evaluating in a formal feasibility study, each with different implications for state exposure, pricing flexibility, and long-term sustainability.
| Model | Description | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Authority Recommended |
State creates a public ski authority that owns and operates the resort with a professional management board. Mirrors ORDA/Gore Mountain model. | Full pricing control; mission-driven; access to state capital; strongest precedent | State absorbs operating risk; requires legislative action |
| Public-Private Partnership | State owns land and core infrastructure; private operator manages day-to-day under a resident-pricing mandate. | Reduces state operational burden; brings private management expertise | Mission drift risk over time; less long-term pricing control |
| Nonprofit Operator | State funds capital; a nonprofit entity manages operations with a public-benefit charter. | Mission-aligned by structure; lean operations; community ownership culture | Fundraising complexity; harder to scale; less access to state capital |
The companion Excel model
is available on request
All figures in this summary come from a fully editable Excel workbook with live formulas for sensitivity testing. Reach out to discuss the assumptions or request the working model.